Loading vLEI.wiki
Fetching knowledge base...
Fetching knowledge base...
This comprehensive explanation has been generated from 167 GitHub source documents. All source documents are searchable here.
Last updated: October 7, 2025
This content is meant to be consumed by AI agents via MCP. Click here to get the MCP configuration.
Note: In rare cases it may contain LLM hallucinations.
For authoritative documentation, please consult the official GLEIF vLEI trainings and the ToIP Glossary.
A Foreign Function Interface (FFI) is a mechanism enabling programs written in one programming language (typically interpreted/scripted languages like Python or JavaScript) to call routines or utilize services written or compiled in another language (typically compiled languages like Rust or C), enabling cross-language interoperability for KERI/CESR implementations.
Within the KERI ecosystem, Foreign Function Interface (FFI) serves as a critical architectural pattern enabling high-performance cryptographic operations implemented in compiled languages (primarily Rust) to be consumed by higher-level application languages (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript). This cross-language interoperability strategy allows the KERI suite to maintain performance-critical components in systems programming languages while providing accessible APIs for application developers.
The FFI approach addresses a fundamental tension in cryptographic identity infrastructure: the need for both computational efficiency (requiring low-level compiled code) and developer accessibility (requiring high-level scripting languages). By implementing core CESR primitives and KERI protocol operations in Rust, the ecosystem achieves:
FFI is an implementation strategy, not a protocol specification. The KERI and CESR protocols themselves are language-agnostic, defined through IETF draft specifications. FFI enables multiple language implementations to share a common high-performance core while maintaining protocol compliance.
When implementing FFI for KERI components:
Use wasm-pack for JavaScript/TypeScript: The official Rust WASM toolchain provides automatic binding generation, TypeScript definitions, and NPM package creation
Choose appropriate Python binding approach: Based on performance requirements:
Handle memory ownership carefully: Ensure clear ownership transfer semantics at FFI boundaries to prevent memory leaks or use-after-free errors
Batch Operations: Minimize FFI call overhead by batching multiple operations into single calls when possible
Zero-Copy Transfers: Use shared memory or buffer passing for large data transfers rather than copying across FFI boundary
Async Considerations: FFI calls are typically synchronous; design APIs to avoid blocking event loops in async runtimes
Key Material Isolation: Keep private keys in Rust memory space; only expose signing/verification operations through FFI
Input Validation: Validate all data at FFI boundary before passing to Rust core to prevent malformed input attacks
Error Handling: Ensure Rust panics are caught and converted to language-appropriate errors rather than crashing the host process
Unit Test Rust Core: Comprehensive testing of cesride primitives in Rust
Integration Test FFI Boundary: Verify correct data marshaling and error handling across language boundaries
End-to-End Protocol Tests: Validate full KERI protocol operations through language bindings
For WASM builds:
wasm-pack is installed from official Rust WASM toolchain--target flag for deployment environmentThe primary FFI-enabled component in the KERI ecosystem is cesride, the Rust implementation of CESR (Composable Event Streaming Representation). According to [Document 4], cesride provides:
Core Cryptographic Primitives:
CESR Parsing Capabilities:
[Document 4] documents the WASM (WebAssembly) FFI for cesride, enabling JavaScript/TypeScript consumption:
Build Targets:
wasm-pack build - optimized for webpack bundlingwasm-pack build --target=nodejs - direct Node.js consumptionwasm-pack build --target=web - browser usage without bundlersDemo Applications:
demo/node/): Demonstrates server-side usagedemo/web/): Demonstrates client-side usage at http://localhost:8080This WASM approach enables the same Rust codebase to run in browsers, Node.js servers, and native applications, providing universal JavaScript/TypeScript access to CESR primitives.
While not extensively documented in the provided sources, [Document 1] and [Document 2] explicitly state that FFI enables "output from Rust-based developments (cesride) to be consumed by higher-level programming languages," with Python being a primary target given keripy (the Python KERI implementation) is the reference implementation.
[Document 88] (Cypher Suites reference) outlines four primary Python binding types applicable to KERI FFI:
The FFI architecture in KERI follows a clear separation:
Rust Core (cesride):
Language Bindings (Python/JS/TS):
FFI introduces minimal overhead when properly implemented:
Zero-Copy Operations: Modern FFI approaches enable zero-copy data transfer between language boundaries for large buffers, critical for streaming CESR data.
Batch Operations: FFI calls have fixed overhead; batching multiple operations reduces per-operation cost.
Memory Management: Rust's ownership model ensures memory safety without garbage collection overhead, while language bindings handle reference counting at the boundary.
The WASM FFI approach ([Document 4]) provides universal platform support:
Desktop:
Mobile:
Web:
The WASM build process requires wasm-pack from the Rust WASM toolchain, providing:
FFI enables language-specific applications to access CESR primitives without reimplementing complex cryptographic operations:
Signing Operations:
Signer primitiveVerification Operations:
Verfer primitiveCESR stream parsing through FFI enables efficient processing:
Text Domain:
Binary Domain:
Rust's memory safety guarantees extend through FFI boundaries:
Ownership Transfer: When data crosses FFI boundary, ownership rules prevent use-after-free and double-free errors.
Bounds Checking: Rust enforces array bounds checking, preventing buffer overflows even when called from unsafe languages.
Type Safety: FFI bindings enforce type constraints, preventing type confusion attacks.
FFI enables cryptographic operation isolation:
Key Material Protection: Private keys remain in Rust memory space with controlled access through FFI.
Side-Channel Resistance: Rust implementations can use constant-time operations, protecting against timing attacks regardless of calling language.
Audit Surface: Cryptographic code concentrated in Rust core simplifies security audits.
Typical development workflow for KERI FFI components:
Unit Tests: Rust core tested independently Integration Tests: FFI boundary tested from each language End-to-End Tests: Full protocol operations tested through bindings
The FFI architecture supports expansion to additional languages:
Go: Via cgo for server-side applications Swift: For native iOS applications Kotlin: For native Android applications C#/.NET: For Windows and enterprise applications
Ongoing FFI optimization opportunities:
SIMD Operations: Leverage CPU vector instructions in Rust core Parallel Processing: Multi-threaded operations in Rust with thread-safe FFI GPU Acceleration: Offload cryptographic operations to GPU via Rust
FFI enables the KERI ecosystem to:
Maintain Single Source of Truth: Core cryptographic operations implemented once in Rust Support Multiple Languages: Bindings enable Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, and future languages Ensure Consistency: All implementations use identical cryptographic primitives Optimize Performance: Compiled Rust code provides maximum efficiency Simplify Maintenance: Bug fixes and improvements in Rust core benefit all languages
This architectural approach has proven successful in other cryptographic ecosystems (libsodium, OpenSSL) and positions KERI for broad adoption across diverse application domains and programming environments.
For native bindings: